The Life of Avlo

En röntgensjuksköterskas tankar om livet, universum och allting.

Tortyr OK så länge det är en del av jobbet.

Publicerad 2008-01-12 00:09:11 i Allmänt

En amerikansk domstol har ännu en gång fastslagit att tortyr är Ok, denna gång med ursäkten att det var en del av förhörsledarens arbetsuppgifter. Tycker mig känna igen resonemanget. Precis som vissa ursäktade sig under Nürnbergrättegångarna med att de bara lydde order så menar denna domstol att personerna inte kan ställas personligt ansvariga, då de gjorde sitt jobb. Det var fyra tidigare fångar från USAs koncentrationsläger i Guantanamo som krävt skadestånd av den amerikanska staten, men de fick som sagt avslag. Jag finner inga ord för detta. Hur länge ska detta få pågå? Det sker helt i det öppna, USA mer eller mindre skryter med att de en gång för alla ar krossat allt vad mänskliga rättigheter heter. Varför reagerar inte världen med sanktioner, handelsblockader och liknande precis som man gör med andra länder som tummar på de mänskliga rättigheterna? Nej just det, det finns ju pengar, makt och andra intressen med i leken och då blir genast triviala saker som mänskliga rättigheter en sekundär fråga.

Kommentarer

Postat av: Sven-Olof

Publicerad 2008-01-12 13:41:00

Det är väl inte så konstigt att amerikansk domstol anser att tortyr är ok om man läser de reservationer som de gjort i samband med ratificeringen av "Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment" ( CAT ).

Läs själv och begrunda...

"The Government of the United States of America reserves the right to communicate, upon ratification, such reservations, interpretive understandings, or declarations as are deemed necessary."

Upon ratification :

Reservations:

"I. The Senate's advice and consent is subject to the following reservations:

(1) That the United States considers itself bound by the obligation under article 16 to prevent `cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment', only insofar as the term `cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment' means the cruel, unusual and inhumane treatment or punishment prohibited by the Fifth, Eighth, and/or Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States.

(2) That pursuant to article 30 (2) the United States declares that it does not consider itself bound by Article 30 (1), but reserves the right specifically to agree to follow this or any other procedure for arbitration in a particular case.

II. The Senate's advice and consent is subject to the following understandings, which shall apply to the obligations of the United States under this Convention:

(1) (a) That with reference to article 1, the United States understands that, in order to constitute torture, an act must be specifically intended to inflict severe physical or mental pain or suffering and that mental pain or suffering refers to prolonged mental harm caused by or resulting from (1) the intentional infliction or threatened infliction of severe physical pain or suffering; (2) the administration or application, or threatened administration or application, of mind altering substances or other procedures calculated to disrupt profoundly the senses or the personality; (3) the threat of imminent death; or (4) the threat that another person will imminently be subjected to death, severe physical pain or suffering, or the administration or application of mind altering substances or other procedures calculated to disrupt profoundly the senses or personality.

(b) That the United States understands that the definition of torture in article 1 is intended to apply only to acts directed against persons in the offender's custody or physical control.

(c) That with reference to article 1 of the Convention, the United States understands that `sanctions' includes judicially-imposed sanctions and other enforcement actions authorized by United States law or by judicial interpretation of such law. Nonetheless, the United States understands that a State Party could not through its domestic sanctions defeat the object and purpose of the Convention to prohibit torture.

(d) That with reference to article 1 of the Convention, the United States understands that the term `acquiescence' requires that the public official, prior to the activity constituting torture, have awareness of such activity and thereafter breach his legal responsibility to intervene to prevent such activity.

(e) That with reference to article 1 of the Convention, the Unites States understands that noncompliance with applicable legal procedural standards does not per se constitute torture.

(2) That the United States understands the phrase, `where there are substantial grounds for believing that he would be in danger of being subjected to torture,' as used in article 3 of the Convention, to mean `if it is more likely than not that he would be tortured.'

(3) That it is the understanding of the United States that article 14 requires a State Party to provide a private right of action for damages only for acts of torture committed in territory under the jurisdiction of that State Party.

(4) That the United States understands that international law does not prohibit the death penalty, and does not consider this Convention to restrict or prohibit the United States from applying the death penalty consistent with the Fifth, Eighth and/or Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States, including any constitutional period of confinement prior to the imposition of the death penalty.

(5) That the United States understands that this Convention shall be implemented by the United States Government to the extent that it exercises legislative and judicial jurisdiction over the matters covered by the Convention and otherwise by the state and local governments. Accordingly, in implementing articles 10-14 and 16, the United States Government shall take measures appropriate to the Federal system to the end that the competent authorities of the constituent units of the United States of America may take appropriate measures for the fulfilment of the Convention.

III. The Senate's advice and consent is subject to the following declarations:

(1) That the United States declares that the provisions of articles 1 through 16 of the Convention are not self-executing.

Kommentera inlägget här
Publiceras ej

Om

Min profilbild

Avlo

Senaste inläggen

Kategorier

Arkiv

Prenumerera och dela